Tuesday, January 28, 2025
The USB Drive
Tuesday, January 21, 2025
Privacy, Online and off
In the current technological era, citizens of nations' privacy remains at risk. As 94.5 percent of internet users today use social media, people's lives have become more exposed than ever. After watching a series of TED talks on privacy, I became aware of just how big of an issue it is.
A quote from one of the TED talks, "How else can one threaten other than with death? Immortality," really stuck out to me. He used that quote to describe how our individual online presence was permanent, and that they would far outlive us, perhaps forever. His comparison to them being "electronic tattoos" was a great way to get the point across. The following TED talk discussed how the government and police use high-power technology to track and collect data on us. Her viewpoint was that we as a people need to stand up for our personal autonomy and protect ourselves from the inevitable abuse of power by the government/police having this information. Her suggestion was to have the government pass laws demanding this information be deleted, only allowing potential criminals/subjects' data to be kept for examination.
All of these privacy issues directly affect me, my peers, and my family. It removes the sense of freedom as an individual knowing that you are being listened to, watched, and collected data at all times. It also makes me feel like I can't trust my own government knowing that I am being observed and everything I do they can access.
According to the videos, we as individuals can simply be cautious of what we post online, say online, or do online knowing that it is permanent. We can also use encryption tools to help prevent wiretaps. Lastly, while I know our government needs to collect data in some aspects for national security, they should limit databases and not collect on each person, just potential threats or targets.
Monday, January 20, 2025
The Eight Values of Free Expression
One of the things our great nation prides itself on is the value of Free Expression. It is, after all, the first amendment in the Constitution. 8 key theories of Free Expression are listed as follows. Marketplace of ideas, Participation in self-government, Stable Change, Individual self-fulfillment, Check on governmental power, Promote tolerance, Promote innovation, and Protect dissent. All of these are important to the value of Free expression, but what is the most important and relevant one to our society?
The theory of Protect Dissent stands out the most to me. The theory was developed by renowned jurist and author Steve Shiffrin, who recently passed away in May of 2023. He was a strong thinker, writing books like What's Wrong with the First Amendment and Dissent, Injustice, and the Meanings of America. This theory originates from the second title, and I strongly believe in it and find it crucial to my value of Free Expression, as well as every individual in America. This theory discusses the protection of each individual's speech and how important it is to be able to voice disagreeing opinions to each other and the government. In 2025, Social Media is one of the most common forms of communication, allowing people to comment on just about any social issue they want, whenever they want. These platforms are strong examples of the importance of this theory. Without the protection of dissent, there is a risk that society could become conformant, the protection of dissent allows the growth of our American Ideals that the country itself was founded upon. This shows us that disagreement is not something that should be feared, but something that should be embraced to protect our democracy. To summarize, this theory is crucial because it allows free expression to remain a right for each individual American, not a select few.
Another theory that stands out to me, is Promote Tolerance. This theory was developed by Lee Bollinger, a former president of Columbia University and Attorney. On top of this, he has authored multiple books as well. The Promote Tolerance theory is found in The Tolerant Society: Freedom of Speech and Extremist Speech. The theory discusses, well, Tolerance of differing opinions. It discusses that a tolerant society is simply better. Simply, I agree. A society that can tolerate discomfort would be stronger, and able to grow more. Discussing uncomfortable things with different individuals can broaden your perspective on societal issues while helping you learn about different viewpoints. This allows for people to engage in civil discussion to improve these societal issues, and allows each person to be heard. Without tolerance, free expression would be masked by saying what is agreed upon or considered tolerable creating the inability to move forward as a society. It would incite fear into people to stay conformed and not be the unique individual Americans they are supposed to be. These are crucial reasons for why this is one of the most important values of free expression as no societal progress could be made without Tolerance. This is without a doubt one of the most important, if not the most important value of Free Expression.
Supreme Court Video
I currently know very little about the Supreme Court. In fact, I didn't even know how many Justices there were. I learned that there were over 100 appointed Supreme Court justices in American History and that they serve an average of 16 years. However, many of them serve longer. According to a quote in the video, becoming a Supreme Court justice is comparable (in rarity) to being struck by lightning. Stating that it was a humbling experience. The Supreme Court is responsible for "drawing boundaries on the governments' power" by telling the President, states, and Congress what to do. I learned that the government was relocated to Washington in 1801, and the Supreme Court lived in temporary housing at the unfinished capitol building. John Marshal had been appointed the Chief Justice at the time. The Dredd Scott case about a black slave named Dredd Scott, where the Supreme Court ruled that blacks could never be citizens is considered the biggest "self-inflicted wound" the court has in its history. This is the most surprising thing I learned, I was unaware of why the Supreme Court was not respected during points in our history but now I am. The Supreme Court receives 7000 new cases per year. They accept around 100 per year. However, each case is individually read and reviewed equally. The most important takeaway point is that the Supreme Court is vital to the successful running of the country. Without it, powers could be unchecked, cases could be made unfair, and the country would not be able to exist the way it has, consistently growing and learning. I did not have a direct opinion on the Supreme Court, I just thought of it as a normal court that just took significant political cases. The video has allowed me to realize just how important their duties are, and how hard the justices work.
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Top 5 Sources of News and Information
Apple News
ESPN
Sports Illustrated
Twitter/X
While personally not the biggest fan of X, it is a news source that I rely on. The layout of the app makes it easy to find news, with specific events and articles being found with simple hashtags. It operates similarly to Instagram, make a post, scroll, and read it. However, it is based more on videos and words than pictures. I like this feature because it can make it easier to read more news about more things, or stay specific and read a lot about one thing. All sorts of opinions and viewpoints come into play here as well, so you can consume the news while reading other people's thoughts on how it's good or bad. It is an effective app for current events, sports, and politics.